Again with the iPad Mini?

Killian Bell reports on the new crop of iPad Mini rumors:

iPad mini will feature a 7.85-inch IGZO display from Sharp, and will start at just $249.

With that kind of price tag, the iPad mini is in a perfect position to fend off any threat from the recently released Google Nexus 7, or the upcoming Kindle Fire 2. Sure, it’s $50 more expensive than its $199 competitors, but you can bet you’ll get a lot more bang for your buck.

I'm holding my breath.

Well, when you're wrong, you're wrong. M.G. Seigler:

As for Steve Jobs implying Apple could never do a smaller tablet because users would have to whittle down their fingers to use it — welcome to Steve Jobs and Apple. Jobs saying that was just as good of an indication that Apple may eventually move into the space. And now it sure looks like they’re getting ready to.

There is just too much buzz coming from too many sources to be based on pure speculation at this point. I still feel like Jobs was right about a 7-inch tablet being a "tweener" but I'll surely be playing with one when (if) it comes out.

Windows Market Share

Alex Wilhelm:

[W]e can anticipate that Windows 7 will overtake Windows XP’s global market share in late July. Our estimates point to the changeover occuring on July 23rd, at around 3:30 Pacific, but suffice it to know that it should happen at some point this month.

I wonder how many people are still running OS X 10.0.

TechCrunch saying things...

Frederic Lardnois & Peter Ha on OS X's new Power Nap feature in Mountain Lion. First this:

Isn’t Power Nap an awesome new feature of OS X? It is if you’re a Mac user but to Windows users, it’s old news.

Then this:

You see, Microsoft had a similar feature in Vista called SideShow. It was supposed to herald the arrival of secondary displays that were going to be built into laptop lids, for example. Those displays were supposed to show you incoming email, upcoming calendar appointments and similar information – all while your computer was in sleep mode. It was, too put it mildly, a dismal failure. Hardware manufacturers never embraced SideShow (with the exception of a handful of laptops) and most consumers probably never heard of it to begin with.

Old news… that's no one's ever heard of. Makes sense.

Larger iPhone

Matt Burns posted this piece today. And someone needs to tell the man he's wrong. I'll volunteer (my thoughts in parenthesis):

The Wall Street Journal reported this morning that Apple is currently ordering larger screens for the next iPhone. With the usual nonsense, the WSJ cited people familiar with the matter and stated these screens measure at least 4-inches diagonally. Production is set to begin next month, they say.

(I hope that's not the case. I like my one-hand-operable phone. I'll wait until something is announced, but I don't want a bigger phone.)

The Journal better be right, though. A 3.5-inch screen is just too small now. At this point to say anything to the contrary is pure fanboi (note the delightful and whimsical spelling) nonsense. The standard argument that consumers don’t want a large phone is tired and overused. Besides, it’s effectively proven wrong by the 20 million Galaxy S II phones sold by Samsung last year. It’s time for a larger iPhone.

(Okay… wrong. If you put every phone Samsung made together they still fall short of the iPhone.)

When Apple debuted the iPhone in 2007 it was a revolutionary device. With a novel interface running on a beautiful 3.5-inch screen, the iPhone rocked the mobile scene. But now, over five years later, the iPhone has changed very little. This is a good thing for the most part. Keep with what works. However, the mobile world has since caught up to the iPhone and started moving forward with risky (read: larger) form factors while Apple kept with the tried and true. This is Apple’s Standard Operating Procedure.

(I could jump in here, but I'll allow you to continue this revisionist history nonsense.)

Apple is notorious for keeping products on the market for as long as they’re financially viable. The company’s computers often only get spec bumps twice a year while other makers push the latest hardware every quarter. The Mac Mini once went a full year without an update. But Apple can do this. Consumers often buy Apple products ignoring specs, thus allowing the company to see larger margins on aging devices. Eventually moves need to be made, though.

(So. Much. Wrong. Apple does beat those dead horses, right? Remember the iPod Mini? Killed by the iPod Nano. Best-selling Mac was the white plastic MacBook. Killed, replaced by the McBook Air. And as far "pushing the latest hardware" is concerned… do you seriously live under a rock? Everyone copies Apple's hardware. So, in short; You're wrong. You couldn't be more wrong if your name was Mr. Wrong and you were the mayor of Wrongville.)

The iPhone is still the dominant smartphone on the market. Apple could likely keep selling the iPhone 4S at $200 for the next year and still see iOS’s marketshare increase. Consumers want the iPhone that bad. But it’s starting to show its age and consumers are noticing.

(Consumers want it bad enough to make it the best-selling phone and it's marketshare will inevitably increase… but serious change is needed because those same consumers clamouring to purchase the device are also noticing how out-of-date it is. Uh-huh. Gotcha.)

There is a new report published nearly every other day proclaiming iOS or Android as the dominant platform. But it doesn’t really matter at this point. Both are winning and Android is doing so with large, attention-grabbing screens that consumers clearly want. Of course Apple will always have its base of loyal fanboys no matter what, but the average consumer is swayed by trend — including the trend of large screens.

 (Except for the millions of consumers worldwide YOU previously mentioned that are buying iPhone in droves, right?)

The next iPhone will have a 4-inch screen per the common rumor circulating ’round the Internet. This excites me greatly. My daily driver is a Droid X, which also has 4-inch screen. After playing with nearly every new phone, I still find its 4-inch 16:9 screen the sweet spot between the usability of a small screen and the additional real estate associated with a large screen. Of course there are numerous arguments against Apple employing a larger screen, but a user on The Verge’s forum’s elegantly explained how it could be done. In short, by using a 3.99-inch 9:5 screen, iOS would scale nearly perfectly and add an additional row for icons on the homescreen. It would then be up to Apple’s all-star marketing team to convince the world it’s a 4-inch screen rather than 3.99.

(So let me understand. Your subjective opinion about screen size should be applied to everyone else is the world. Perfect. Also, with regard to 'elegant scaling' It doesn't matter how much or little the screen size changes, developers will still have to update their applications. Which is no small consideration.)

There are no doubt blind Apple zealots absolutely appalled at the thought of a larger iPhone. Ignore ‘em. Change is inevitable. In response to MG’s take on the Evo 4G back in 2010, I wrote “Saying that the EVO 4G’s screen is too big is like saying, “No thanks, I would rather ride in the back of a cab than in your limo. I like feeling cramped and restricted.”” (We both were right about the phone’s horrible battery life, though) That still holds true today. A large screen, if done right, is an amazing feature and one Apple will likely employ in the future.

(I don't know whether or not Apple will change the screen size of the iPhone — I'm in the 'i hope not' camp — but I DID enjoy the way you just declared that anyone who disagrees with you is not just wrong, but is a 'bling Apple zealot'. Fun. And as far as you stupid — yes, stupid — car analogy goes… try this one: You take your limousine and I'll take my Ferrari. Both luxury automobiles, but which is BETTER can certainly be debated.)

Again, to fulfill its goal of purely making money, Apple does not need to change anything about the iPhone. The iPhone 4S sold like gangbusters on the back of just a trivial spec bump and worthless Siri. However, the iPhone 4 form factor is no longer the single most attractive phone on the market. Other mobile phone companies have caught up with Apple. That can’t sit well with The House Jobs Built. Apple needs to regain its street cred and silence the haters, if only for a moment.

(Once again your stance is: Apple's doing everything right, they're selling iPhone like crazy and they're collecting cash with bulldozers, but still… TOTALLY behind the times. Get with it Apple!)

Sometime later this year Apple will introduce the next generation of the iPhone. As proven by previous iPhone rumors, it’s hard to tell what’s on tap. It might have a larger screen and, quite honestly, it might not. The WSJ’s report could be wrong. That said, there will come a time that Apple rolls out a large screen for the iPhone. Hopefully it’s sooner rather than later.

(There WILL come a time. Noted for future reference, Matt.)

Apple's Security Model

John Brownlee:

Apple’s doing a lot right when it comes to security: GateKeeper, app sandboxing, and so on. Could Apple keep OS X even safer by pulling a Microsoft and outsourcing most of its security to third-party antivirus companies?

No. Lack of necessity for security software (and the software/battery drain they provide) is a big part of what makes average people feel safe buying and using a Mac over a PC.

Apple as a Cellular Carrier

Ben Brooks on Apple's supposed plan to become their own service provider and bypass carriers entirely:

How about the fact that they would have to build a wireless network and get the spectrum to do that from the FCC? Apple can figure out the phone subsidies, but magically making a cell network infrastructure appear is likely to be much harder.

You're thinking too small, Ben. That's just the US. Apple has iPhone customers all over the globe. 

Samsung Copies Apple

Matt Brian:

Samsung will open own branded stores later this year, also rolling out smaller Samsung ‘Experience Zones’ and store-within-a-store kiosks in larger retail outlets (much like Apple does with Best Buy)

Apple store-within-a-stores pale in comparison to the shopping experience at an actual Apple Store. Matt continues...

It draws parallels with Apple’s own retail experience, but Samsung isn’t going to operate its own stores, instead it will outsource it to third-party companies.

I suspect that's the same problem with Apple's store-within-a-stores. It will be interesting to see how this turns out.

New Mac Malware

Jake Smith on a couple bits of Mac malware:

The most recent virus found was one that affects Word for Mac, which allows the infiltrator to gain access to the user’s files.

Leave it to Microsoft to compromise security on the Mac.

There’s also other viruses that take advantage of vulnerabilities in Java

And this is why both Java and flash aren't installed on new Macs. I haven't had Java installed in over a year… and I haven't ever noticed.

iOS Game Pad?

Killian Bell on the rumour that Apple is developing a physical controller for iOS:

iOS devices are terrific for mobile gaming, but they could be even better. They’re already stealing market share from portable consoles from the likes of Nintendo or Sony, who saw their share of software sales slip from 70% to 36% and 11% to 6% respectively between 2009 and 2011. But there’s only so far they can go without physical controls.

I can't see it happening. Honestly. However,  what I could see is Apple developing a bluetooth controller for Apple TV that allows iOS game to be played on your 1080p HD screen. On the flip-side, perhaps Apple has plans to bake in new APIs for hardware developers to create physical controllers. So they've built one for testing purposes.

Apple's "New Logo"

Buster Heine:

Tim Cook & Co. just wrapped up their event on the new iPad. At the very end of the keynote the last slide showed the Apple logo as pictured above. Is this a new logo Apple will be using? Apple rarely makes artistic adjustments to their logo during keynotes. We think it looks pretty neat and is a great modern interpretation of the retro rainbow Apple logo.

What do you think? Will Apple use this new logo more often, or was it a one time thing?

This logo is obviously just for this event. It matches the facade of venue's decoration. Move along.