More on Chrome for iOS

John Gruber:

That’s a good point about email, but it doesn’t apply to web browsing. There is no “Safari” sheet in iOS. And even for email, the answer is that iOS should allow third-party apps — like Sparrow — to provide their own system-wide sharing sheets.

True, but if Apple begins to allow third party apps to run as the default browser then they have a crack in the dam. The deluge of demand for replacement of other first-party system-wide apps will follow shortly and they need to have the structure in place to make that happen (such as APIs for share-sheets, etc).

To be clear I think they should, and I hope they will.

On Chrome for iOS

John Gruber

I see the security and control angles on not allowing third-party runtimes, which in turn disallows third-party rendering and JavaScript engines. But I can’t see the angle behind not allowing a third-party app from the App Store to be specified as your preferred default over Mobile Safari. (Same goes for email.)

I suspect the reason is because of the deep system integration of things like Safari, Mail, Contacts, and the like. Take Mail, for example, if you could set Sparrow as your default client on iOS you'd still have to configure Mail because any email sent from other apps uses the Mail API. Then rely on IMAP to sync those things up. Inelegant and un-Apple.

Having said that I can certainly appreciate why people might want to choose their default Browser/Mail client/Address Book/whatever. Hopefully Apple can sort that out, because I agree with John whole-heartedly on this:

The pressure for Apple to allow users to specify a third-party app as their default browser is going to increase significantly after this.

Being Wrong... in a Classy Way

Todd Sullivan was also wrong about the iPhone in 2007:

Apple (AAPL) begins selling its revolutionary iPhone this summer and it will mark the end of the string of hits for the company. The company has had a string of hits since it introduced the iPod and its shareholders have benefited sending shares from $7 in 2003 to the $100 they sit at today. The introduction of the iPhone will be the first miscue for the company and send its shares, priced for perfection tumbling.

Of course that didn't happen, but Sullivan unlike others owned it. When asked by Networkworld about his failed prediction he simply said:

I was wrong about everything on it except for the price drop to $299. -- Sent from my iPhone

That's how it's done.

John C. Dvorak, Genius

John C. Dvorak trying to explain why he was so wrong about the iPhone back in 2007:

Since I’ve written over 4,500 articles over the last 30 years I would hope that people look at the track record. I blew it about six times in a major way like this. I do not consider that bad.

Obviously Dvorak is more wrong about some companies than others. Here's some highlights from an article written by Mr. Dvorak on February 19, 1984:

There are some good reasons that the [Macintosh] may not become the raving success hoped for by Apple.

The items on the list? Among others are Icons, Fonts, and the Mouse. Another complaint by Dvorak? Stop me if you've heard it:

The machine has no slots for expansion and it therefore restricted in versatility.

Lack of expansion has been Apple's bane. Lead to the death of the iMac, iBook (MacBook), PowerBook (MacBook Pro), MacBook Air, iPod, iPhone and iPad.

TechCrunch saying things...

Frederic Lardnois & Peter Ha on OS X's new Power Nap feature in Mountain Lion. First this:

Isn’t Power Nap an awesome new feature of OS X? It is if you’re a Mac user but to Windows users, it’s old news.

Then this:

You see, Microsoft had a similar feature in Vista called SideShow. It was supposed to herald the arrival of secondary displays that were going to be built into laptop lids, for example. Those displays were supposed to show you incoming email, upcoming calendar appointments and similar information – all while your computer was in sleep mode. It was, too put it mildly, a dismal failure. Hardware manufacturers never embraced SideShow (with the exception of a handful of laptops) and most consumers probably never heard of it to begin with.

Old news… that's no one's ever heard of. Makes sense.

iPad is Dooooooomed

Doug Gross writing for CNN:

It's sacrilege to some Apple fanboys.

Six words in and this article is already stupid.Yes, I get it; Apple is actually a cult-like religion and those who use it's products merely brainwashed zombies who have a blind allegiance to Apple. It has nothing to do with the quality of the products and software. Nothing.

But when Microsoft unveiled the Surface tablet (actually a pair of them) Monday, the software company clearly had one ultimate goal: to make a tablet that's better than the iPad.

This is just about the only thing we agree on.

By most standards, Apple has crushed its tablet rivals that have tried to compete feature-for-feature. No single tablet running Google's Android system has gotten much traction (save the smaller, cheaper Kindle Fire from Amazon) and BlackBerry maker RIM's Playbook hit the market with a thud.

Yeah... the Kindle Fire and iPad are neck-and-neck.

And Microsoft's past attempts at building Apple-like gadgets -- witness the iPod-copying Zune -- have failed.

Okay, we agree on two things. Gross goes on to list five reasons the Surface may best the iPad. They are awesome. The first is the keyboard.

A frustration for many users of the iPad and other touchscreen devices is the keyboard. While it's possible to get somewhat proficient at tapping spots on a flat screen, most acknowledge it's impossible to get e-mail and other documents written as quickly as with physical keys.

Typing on a flat surface sounds like a real pain. What's Microsoft's solution, Doug?

The Surface keyboard will be part of its Touch Cover (...) with pressure-sensitive flat keys

Oh. Much better.Yes, there will be another keyboard cover with actual keys (and a trackpad) but neither has been tested yet. And Gross simply writes off all the 3-rd party iPad keyboards because they can be clunky.

Gross then goes on to quote some folks who love the keyboard. Farhad Manjoo starts out with, "If [the touch cover] works well" and ends with "If the Surface ships with the keyboard -- and if Microsoft markets the device as a tablet that will let you get some work done -- it could be a big hit." If, if, if, and could. A glowing preview if ever I've heard one.

Gross then goes on to say the Surface is bigger and that's what makes it better. The screen is larger (though widescreen, so I'm not sold on portrait mode - which Microsoft doesn't seem to want us to use anyway), the machine is heavier, and, admittidly, thinner. But Microsoft must have breathed a sigh of relief when the new iPad come out, because it is thicker and heavier than iPad 2 (with which Surface was competing during it's development).

Something I found especially fun was this bit:

[I]t's optimized to have essentially the same dimensions as a movie screen: So, farewell black bars when watching video.

I don't know how people use their iPads, but I do not watch movies on mine unless I'm somewhere without a TV and have lots of time to kill. Older full-screen content (which I watch a lot of) will still have black bars, and academy aspect ratio movies (think Lord of the Rings) will still have black bars. Whatever. I just cannot understand why every screen is designed to have the same aspect ratio as movies. Are people really watching that much video content on their iPads?

Next up is power. The surface will be much more powerful than the iPad, apparently. Even though no one's used it. He says:

Especially with the Windows 8 Pro model

Are you kidding me? This implies that obviously the Surface RT will be more powerful, but the Surface Pro will be especially powerful besting the iPad to the point of embarassment. This strikes me as awfully presumptious. Gross doesn't take into account the CPU requirements of the OS running on the tablet. Believing, based on nothing, that Microsoft's OS can run as power-effeciently as iOS is very optimistic. Anyhow, Gross continues:

The Windows Pro model will run on an i5 Intel processor

And I'm sure it will get iPad's 10 hour battery life. I'd even say that the Surface pro won't get battery life as good as the 11" MacBook Air. Less than 5 hours. My personal guess? Surface for Windows 8 Pro will get around 3 hours on a charge.

Gross then extolls the virtues of the USB port:

[The USB] ports open up the possibility of extra storage, printing and other external capabilities that should be easier and quicker than the workarounds iPad users need involving cloud storage, Wi-Fi connections and the like.

So... just grab your Surface, fold the kickstand out, slap on the keyboard, connect a USB hub and hook up to your printer, external HDD, and card reader. What? This sounds like a docked laptop to me. With Dropbox, AirPrint, and Apple's Camera Connection Kit I can do all that same stuff wirelessly. And isn't wireless and portable the point of tablet computers?

The final killer feature of Surface? Xbox SmartGlass... which has not yet been linked to the Surface by Microsoft itself. In fact, Gross is the only person who has even talked about this. So one of Surface's killer features isn't even a feature yet. Anyway, he says:

It will connect a smartphone or tablet with the Xbox, which in turn will be connected with the television. By connecting the devices, users can watch a movie on their television while getting bonus material on their tablet. They could also start enjoying a game or movie on the tablet, then transfer it to a TV -- or vice versa.

If only Apple had something that could do something like this...

Wayback: Sell AAPL!

Thomas H. Kee, writing for Marketwatch in January:

This stall is coming, it is closer than most people think, and what we were just witness to is likely the peak in this growth cycle. The company will not be able to match that growth rate again, and from here, the company will transition into a much slower growth giant.

While this may still happen, those who sold AAPL in January got ~$450 back, today they would get ~$550. For what it's worth MSFT would have earned you a cool fiver in the same period.

Sandboxing and the Mac App Store

Macworld:

But because TextExpander 4 can’t adhere to Apple’s recently-enforced sandboxing guidelines, the new version of the app isn’t available in the Mac App Store.

I think Apple will eventually back down on the sandboxing issue. Otherwise many great apps will have to leave the App Store which makes them less discoverable for average users. If users can't find great applications that hurts their user experience. Here's hoping good sense will prevail in this regard.

Via The Loop

Why do I still read TechCrunch?

Matt Burns on Microsoft's Surface announcement (selected excerpts):

Compared to the iPad, it’s a bit utilitarian with hard lines, full size I/O ports, and heat vents. But it also seems like a serious tablet rather than a plaything.

This is the kind of thing that drives me up the wall. Since iPad is being used in businesses, schools, and by individuals for audio, video, graphic design, and general productivity I don't fully understand how the iPad is a 'plaything'. That kind of statement can't simply be thrown around and be true simply because you wrote it, Matt. Please qualify your statements.

The hardware doesn’t matter, though. Remember? The spec is dead. Microsoft wisely talked up the Surface’s capabilities and design today more than listing the computing specs.

Like battery life, which is basically irrelevant for a tablet (or any other mobile device).

I’ve yet to touch the Surface myself

Noted for future reference.

There are still a lot of unknowns at this point. Never mind the Surface’s price:

Because it's largely irrelevant.

How is the keyboard during extended sessions?

Or during any sessions. No one outside Microsoft has had opportunity to use it yet.

How hot does it get after 5 hours?

Does it even last 5 hours?

With that, how long does the battery last?

With modern Intel Core i5 processor in a 9.3mm enclosure that requires fans for cooling.

The iPad’s strength comes from the sheer number of 3rd party apps available through the App Store.

Just like the original iPhone.

Apple lured a crazy number of developers to its platform through the promise of profit-sharing and a fair distribution environment.

A dastardly tactic if ever I heard one.

Microsoft isn’t reinventing app development with the Surface. The tablet runs Windows after all. It is the most dominant computing platform on Earth. At this early stage it seems like a smart move for a developer to jump on the Metro bandwagon. Even if the Surface crashes and burns, there will be dozens of other Windows 8 tablets from the normal players.

Why would developers bother with Metro if they don't have to? I suspect most of them will just continue to develop for Windows like they always have because their product will have a greater reach. Very few devices will be Metro-only and without that push what is the motivation to add yet another platform?

To me the Surface doesn’t seem like a serious iPad contender but rather a reference design or even a halo device. When released later this year ARM models will likely start around $400-$600 and x86 models will hit closer to $1,000. Even though it will likely never outsell the iPad, the Surface sets a clear standard for HP, Dell, Lenovo, Acer, and Asus. It shows the rest of the industry the proper way to make a Windows 8 tablet. As a halo device, it’s essentially designed to draw attention to Microsoft and Windows 8 like the Corvette does for Chevy.

What? Ignoring the fact that wanting a Corvette has never lead me to to buy a Cavalier, how is a tablet priced like an "ultrabook" (read: MacBook Air clone) supposed to set the standard? If you need a proper keyboard and pointing device to use REAL Windows 8 then why not just buy an actual "ultrabook"? The way I use my iPad and my MacBook are very different. And that's why I like having two separate devices. Microsoft's whole "no compromises" mantra for Windows 8 seems kind of suspect to me. I'm very interested to see how this all shakes down when this ships, but trying to be master of both will, I suspect, lead to actually having the downside of both and the upsides of neither.

Microsoft hasn’t been hip since Windows XP.

Windows XP was hip?

Windows 7 barely makes up for Windows Vista.

That not really fair. Unless you bought Vista... then had to buy Windows 7. I actually think Windows 7 is the best OS Microsoft has ever released. Not as good as OS X Panther. But great for Microsoft.

The fate of Windows Mobile rests on a struggling Finnish company. The Zune was never loved. Bing is a clone. No one uses Hotmail. I still don’t exactly know the benefit of Windows Live. The company’s lone shinning star is a 7-year old game system. Microsoft has been just surviving over the last decade. As much as Windows itself needs a killer device like the Surface, Microsoft the company needs a desperate shot of credibility.

I enjoyed the long list of MS failures (basically anything not Windows, Office, or Xbox) then the factual declaration of Surface as a Killer device. Maybe it will be a 'killer device' but it's a little too premature to be deciding that isn't it, Matt?

Like most people, I do not have a dog in this fight. I’m not an ignorant fanboy, blindly cheering on a random company. I don’t care what company wins the mobile or desktop wars as long as the consumer ultimately wins. The last few years Apple has produced the industry leading devices. And now, once again with the Surface, Microsoft has a champion worthy of praise.

Champion? That implies victory... the would-be contender hasn't even decided when he'll fight yet. But, at least you didn't spell 'fanboy' with an 'i'.

Possible iPhone Parts Photos Surface

Mark Gurman:

Earlier today we posted the first image of the back plate for the next-generation iPhone, and now we have received several more images that are very high-resolution. These new shots showcase a comparison between the black and white versions of the next-generation iPhone back.

These parts look much more like something Apple would produce than any of the horrid renders that seem to be floating around. Although that off-colour strip of metal across the back is ugly. Apple can't ship that. 

New Look iPhone UI Elements

Killian Bell:

Apple could be gearing up to make some changes in iOS 6 that will introduce a fresh new look to the iPhone. This summer we could be waving goodbye to that traditional iPhone blue that has adorned iOS apps for the past five years and saying hello to sexy silver.

I must say, these look great. The heightened contrast really is awesome. I hope this turns out to be true.

Microsoft Office for iPad

Jake Smith:

BGR reports that Microsoft Office for iPad is launching in November.

I'm sure the masses will be delighted if this turns out to be true. But if this is the case then Microsoft is basically admitting defeat in the tablet space. Office as an exclusive for Windows could be their killer app. And they're giving it away. It'll be interesting to watch, however.

Auto-WiFI

Lex Friedman:

Some iPhone competitors offer a clever feature for conserving battery life: They use geolocation to figure out where you are, automatically enabling and disabling the Wi-Fi antenna when you’re away from a known hotspot.

That does sound like it could be great (not that I've ever felt like my batter life is lacking), but I'd need to have fast access to turn WiFi back on if I was near a hot-spot my phone didn't know about. In fact, quick access to WiFi, Bluetooth, 3G, etc should be baked into iOS. I'd rather see that than Lex's suggestion.

(Via The Brooks Review)

Mac App Store Killing Universal Keyboard Shortcuts?

Erica Sadun:

TUAW has been told that Apple will be rejecting all apps with hotkey functionality starting June 1, regardless of whether the new features are hotkey related or not. Basically, if you're developing one of those apps, an app that assumes you can still add hotkeys, don't bother submitting it to the Mac App Store.

I'm going to file this under Bogus and Misinformation. I'm officially in the Not True camp.

Larger iPhone

Matt Burns posted this piece today. And someone needs to tell the man he's wrong. I'll volunteer (my thoughts in parenthesis):

The Wall Street Journal reported this morning that Apple is currently ordering larger screens for the next iPhone. With the usual nonsense, the WSJ cited people familiar with the matter and stated these screens measure at least 4-inches diagonally. Production is set to begin next month, they say.

(I hope that's not the case. I like my one-hand-operable phone. I'll wait until something is announced, but I don't want a bigger phone.)

The Journal better be right, though. A 3.5-inch screen is just too small now. At this point to say anything to the contrary is pure fanboi (note the delightful and whimsical spelling) nonsense. The standard argument that consumers don’t want a large phone is tired and overused. Besides, it’s effectively proven wrong by the 20 million Galaxy S II phones sold by Samsung last year. It’s time for a larger iPhone.

(Okay… wrong. If you put every phone Samsung made together they still fall short of the iPhone.)

When Apple debuted the iPhone in 2007 it was a revolutionary device. With a novel interface running on a beautiful 3.5-inch screen, the iPhone rocked the mobile scene. But now, over five years later, the iPhone has changed very little. This is a good thing for the most part. Keep with what works. However, the mobile world has since caught up to the iPhone and started moving forward with risky (read: larger) form factors while Apple kept with the tried and true. This is Apple’s Standard Operating Procedure.

(I could jump in here, but I'll allow you to continue this revisionist history nonsense.)

Apple is notorious for keeping products on the market for as long as they’re financially viable. The company’s computers often only get spec bumps twice a year while other makers push the latest hardware every quarter. The Mac Mini once went a full year without an update. But Apple can do this. Consumers often buy Apple products ignoring specs, thus allowing the company to see larger margins on aging devices. Eventually moves need to be made, though.

(So. Much. Wrong. Apple does beat those dead horses, right? Remember the iPod Mini? Killed by the iPod Nano. Best-selling Mac was the white plastic MacBook. Killed, replaced by the McBook Air. And as far "pushing the latest hardware" is concerned… do you seriously live under a rock? Everyone copies Apple's hardware. So, in short; You're wrong. You couldn't be more wrong if your name was Mr. Wrong and you were the mayor of Wrongville.)

The iPhone is still the dominant smartphone on the market. Apple could likely keep selling the iPhone 4S at $200 for the next year and still see iOS’s marketshare increase. Consumers want the iPhone that bad. But it’s starting to show its age and consumers are noticing.

(Consumers want it bad enough to make it the best-selling phone and it's marketshare will inevitably increase… but serious change is needed because those same consumers clamouring to purchase the device are also noticing how out-of-date it is. Uh-huh. Gotcha.)

There is a new report published nearly every other day proclaiming iOS or Android as the dominant platform. But it doesn’t really matter at this point. Both are winning and Android is doing so with large, attention-grabbing screens that consumers clearly want. Of course Apple will always have its base of loyal fanboys no matter what, but the average consumer is swayed by trend — including the trend of large screens.

 (Except for the millions of consumers worldwide YOU previously mentioned that are buying iPhone in droves, right?)

The next iPhone will have a 4-inch screen per the common rumor circulating ’round the Internet. This excites me greatly. My daily driver is a Droid X, which also has 4-inch screen. After playing with nearly every new phone, I still find its 4-inch 16:9 screen the sweet spot between the usability of a small screen and the additional real estate associated with a large screen. Of course there are numerous arguments against Apple employing a larger screen, but a user on The Verge’s forum’s elegantly explained how it could be done. In short, by using a 3.99-inch 9:5 screen, iOS would scale nearly perfectly and add an additional row for icons on the homescreen. It would then be up to Apple’s all-star marketing team to convince the world it’s a 4-inch screen rather than 3.99.

(So let me understand. Your subjective opinion about screen size should be applied to everyone else is the world. Perfect. Also, with regard to 'elegant scaling' It doesn't matter how much or little the screen size changes, developers will still have to update their applications. Which is no small consideration.)

There are no doubt blind Apple zealots absolutely appalled at the thought of a larger iPhone. Ignore ‘em. Change is inevitable. In response to MG’s take on the Evo 4G back in 2010, I wrote “Saying that the EVO 4G’s screen is too big is like saying, “No thanks, I would rather ride in the back of a cab than in your limo. I like feeling cramped and restricted.”” (We both were right about the phone’s horrible battery life, though) That still holds true today. A large screen, if done right, is an amazing feature and one Apple will likely employ in the future.

(I don't know whether or not Apple will change the screen size of the iPhone — I'm in the 'i hope not' camp — but I DID enjoy the way you just declared that anyone who disagrees with you is not just wrong, but is a 'bling Apple zealot'. Fun. And as far as you stupid — yes, stupid — car analogy goes… try this one: You take your limousine and I'll take my Ferrari. Both luxury automobiles, but which is BETTER can certainly be debated.)

Again, to fulfill its goal of purely making money, Apple does not need to change anything about the iPhone. The iPhone 4S sold like gangbusters on the back of just a trivial spec bump and worthless Siri. However, the iPhone 4 form factor is no longer the single most attractive phone on the market. Other mobile phone companies have caught up with Apple. That can’t sit well with The House Jobs Built. Apple needs to regain its street cred and silence the haters, if only for a moment.

(Once again your stance is: Apple's doing everything right, they're selling iPhone like crazy and they're collecting cash with bulldozers, but still… TOTALLY behind the times. Get with it Apple!)

Sometime later this year Apple will introduce the next generation of the iPhone. As proven by previous iPhone rumors, it’s hard to tell what’s on tap. It might have a larger screen and, quite honestly, it might not. The WSJ’s report could be wrong. That said, there will come a time that Apple rolls out a large screen for the iPhone. Hopefully it’s sooner rather than later.

(There WILL come a time. Noted for future reference, Matt.)